German Court Declares Crypto Stealing Isn’t Exactly a Crime? Shocking! 😲

by

In a twist that might make even the most seasoned legal minds do a double take, a German appeals court has effectively declared that using a known wallet password to pilfer cryptocurrency isn’t necessarily unlawful. Yep, you read that right — leave your moral compass at the door, and maybe grab a beer. 🍺

The decision has rallied a veritable chorus of legal experts and crypto enthusiasts alike, all crying foul—or at least, waving in the vague direction of a gaping loophole big enough to drive a Zeppelin through. 🎈🚀

German Law: The Never-Ending Saga of “Well, It’s Not That Simple”

Picture this: a man helps a fellow set up a shiny new crypto wallet stuffed with a modest €2.5 million worth of tokens—imagine the sort of party that could buy. 🎉

The thief, obviously feeling quite clever, creates the wallet and keeps the 24-word recovery phrase safely tucked away. Sadly, the unfortunate victim never changes this wordy security code, proving once again that digital security is just as reliable as leaving your front door wide open. 🚪

Later, using the very same recovery phrase (because why not?), the man transfers the coins—without permission, of course—potentially making off with a small fortune. The court’s takeaway? He didn’t “hack” the wallet, because he *legitimately* set it up and kept the passwords himself. Talk about a loophole! 🕵️‍♂️

The court arrived at an extraordinary conclusion: since the defendant used passwords he “legitimately” possessed and did not employ deceit or hacking (which, let’s be honest, sounds like an elaborate game of digital Monopoly), no crime was committed. No “overcoming security” here, folks—just a happy little walk in the legal park. 🌳

Best part? Blockchain systems don’t care about user intent or permission—only whether the cryptographic signature checks out. So, if you want to transfer your own assets with a password you forgot where you got it, Germany might just give you a free pass. 🎫

This bombshell of a decision underscores the ever-growing difficulty legal systems have in trying to keep pace with the cryptic universe of decentralized assets. It’s like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, armed with a tiny watercolor brush. 🖌️

While the court concedes that civil breaches—think broken promises or broken trust—are still a big deal, they’re not generally criminal. So, burglary? Meh, maybe not under current law if you used your grandma’s password with a twinkle in your eye. 😏

Of course, if credentials are obtained through outright fraud or hacking, different legal rules apply. But this particular ruling is about the no-fuss, no-hassle method of “I know the password, so it’s fine.” Because apparently, knowing is half the law. 🎲

For now, German lawmakers have some serious thinking to do, as this ruling opens a Pandora’s box of legal grey areas that might make even Kafka scratch his head. 📦🤯

Read More

2025-07-30 00:16