Crypto Clash: US Congress Debates Nationalizing Bitcoin Reserves

by

As the US strives to become the crypto capital of the world, the House of Representatives is abuzz with discussions on the implications and pathways. However, amidst the support, a debate has sparked, with contrasting views from crypto experts.

The Great Bitcoin Reserve Debate

Lyn Alden, a renowned crypto advocate and financial analyst, opposes the idea of nationalizing companies to build a strategic Bitcoin reserve. She warns that this could lead to a violation of property rights in the country. In a statement on X, she said,

“Nationalizing a company like that is a good way for a country to tell the world that they don’t respect property rights and to think twice about investing in the country for the next couple of decades.”

While Alden opposes the approach, citing concerns for investors’ funds, other crypto experts have different perspectives.

Crypto Advocates in Favor of Nationalizing Companies for Bitcoin Reserve

Willy Woo, known for his unique insights on crypto, created a playbook for the US bitcoin reserve detailing all the required efforts and approaches. His idea was acknowledged by Max Keiser, an American filmmaker and bitcoin advocate, who said, “Willy’s view is worth considering.”

Keiser also indicated that if Russia and China implement this proposal, they could acquire 1 million bitcoin, which will potentially lead to a hash war. He also stated that such a move will push the US to seize private firms like MicroStrategy, Riot Blockchain for national security.

[post_titles_links postid=”478878″]

Can the US Nationalize Companies for a Bitcoin Reserve?

In 2025, the US implemented a series of laws and regulations to evolve cryptocurrency and digital assets in the country as it aspires to become the global ‘crypto capital.’ With new blockchain developments, innovative crypto regulations, and President Trump’s support, it is possible for the US to nationalize companies for a bitcoin strategic reserve in the near future.

Final Thought

After March 6, when Trump signed an executive order to establish a bitcoin reserve, it became a global trend. While the approach of nationalizing companies for cryptocurrency has gained massive support from US representatives, many investors are fearing to invest in those companies.

[article_inside_subscriber_shortcode title=”Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!” description=”Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.” category_name=”News” category_id=”6″]

FAQs

How would nationalizing companies for a Bitcoin reserve affect the U.S. economy and crypto market?

Nationalizing companies for a Bitcoin reserve could have mixed effects. Proponents argue it could strengthen the US balance sheet, help pay down national debt, hedge against inflation, and boost the legitimacy of crypto. However, critics like Lyn Alden warn it could violate property rights, deter foreign investment, increase taxpayer risk if Bitcoin’s value crashes, and potentially lead to government manipulation of the crypto market, contradicting Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos.

How does the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve compare to similar efforts in other countries?

The U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, established by Executive Order on March 6, 2025, primarily involves holding forfeited Bitcoin as a long-term reserve and not selling it. This differs from countries like El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender and actively purchased it, or Bhutan, which accumulated reserves through state-owned mining. Other nations like China, the UK, and Ukraine also hold significant Bitcoin, largely from seizures. Many countries (e.g., Brazil, Russia, Japan) are proposing or exploring similar reserves, while others like Switzerland and the EU remain hesitant or focus on CBDCs.

Read More

2025-07-05 13:23