Crypto Bill Delays: The Waiting Room of American Money 😂🤔

by

In a windowless room where the air smells faintly of coffee and responsibility, the crypto market structure bill sits like a patient on a hard bench. The clock ticks with the stubborn pace of a Russian winter, and everyone speaks of urgency as if urgency were a polite guest who never leaves. The great drama of modern money unfolds with the quiet sighs of bored committee members and the occasional cough of a regulator who has misplaced his sense of timing.

Key Highlights

  • The U.S. market structure bill drifts and stalls as lawmakers and crypto leaders quarrel over rules, as if the family fortune depended on a coin toss.
  • Coinbase and other industry groups withdraw support, citing doubts about stablecoins, DeFi, and who should hold the conductor’s baton for regulation.
  • Even if the bill survives, its implementation could take years, tangled in rulemaking like ivy across an old, dignified mansion.

In early 2026, the future of the bill remains uncertain, a question mark that refuses to die in a sunny room or a smoky back office. It was meant to bring clarity to how the government would oversee crypto, yet it wanders from deadline to deadline-September 2025, then the end of the year, and now further delays, as if deadlines themselves have learned to dodge responsibility. 😅

Officials argue over the tempers of stablecoins and who gets to command the rules, turning what should be a straightforward march into a slow waltz with misgivings. Major industry groups pull back, and crucial Senate hearings are shelved like unused props in a forgotten play.

“I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith. As we take a brief pause before moving to a markup, this market structure bill reflects months of…

– Senator Tim Scott (@SenatorTimScott) January 15, 2026

Senate hearings postponed as talks stall

Two weeks into 2026, the Senate Banking Committee postponed a planned markup vote. The aim-define language and framework-drifts further away like a boat that forgot its pier. Chairman Tim Scott, a man whose tie looks as tired as the progress, called the pause “brief.”

“I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith,” he said, with the air of a man who has learned to repeat phrases until they sound honest. The cancellation follows a similar postponement by the Senate Agriculture Committee, which now aims for January 27. The calendar ached, and still the pages refused to turn.

Coinbase pulls back on its support

Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong declares the bill unpalatable, a thing “with too many issues.” His tweet lists problems: bans on tokenized equities, DeFi prohibitions, limits on stablecoin interest, and a shift of power from the CFTC to the SEC. It is as if the bill were a dish too spicy for a quiet dinner party. 😂

“After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written. There are too many issues, including: – A defacto ban on tokenized equities – DeFi prohibitions, giving the government unlimited access to your financial…”

– Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) January 14, 2026

Armstrong concludes that this version would be worse than the present arrangement. “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” he adds, with a tone that implies a pessimist’s love of the long view. “Hopefully we can all get to a better draft.”

Other voices insist on rules that guard consumers without stifling invention. Ji Hun Kim of the Crypto Council for Innovation emphasizes consumer choice and the value of clear, workable rules that protect without narrowing the realm of financial services. Arjun Sethi, Kraken co-CEO, reminds us that market-structure legislation is inherently complex-that the absence of friction is not the same as absence of effort.

Experts say rulemaking could take years

Even if a bill passes, full implementation could linger for years. Justin Slaughter of Paradigm notes that the law would demand about 45 distinct rules, a project that might stretch across a presidential term and beyond, as if the paperwork itself has a life longer than the lives of those who draft it. 😅

Yet lobbying groups hold to a thread of hope. Summer Mersinger of the Blockchain Association calls the delay a “moment of recalibration, not an end point.” The Clarity Act, as some call it when the tea is cold and the lamps are low, keeps fighting its way through political briar, because people sometimes still believe in rules, even when they are late to the party.

Read More

2026-01-15 19:34