Looking at the chart, the price of Bitcoin is trying to stay above the $71,400 support level. If it succeeds, it could quickly rise to meet the downward trendline, and then potentially break through the strong resistance around $74,000.
Things really came to a head for me this week, on April 7th, when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent publicly criticized Coinbase on Fox News. He called them a “recalcitrant actor” and accused them of delaying important new legislation. This was in direct response to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s position that he’d rather see no bill passed than one with serious flaws. It’s a pretty significant disagreement playing out publicly.
Imagine, if you will, a clock ticking ever so ominously towards the year 2029, the supposed “deadline” by which quantum computers may unravel the very fabric of Bitcoin and Ethereum’s cryptography. The developers, those industrious souls, have rolled up their sleeves and set to work with a determination that would put even the most diligent housekeeper to shame.
According to the astute observers at Santiment, the Cardano network has lately displayed a remarkable, if belated, stir of engagement. Reports indicate a sudden surge in activity, implying that sentiment toward this beleaguered altcoin may, at last, be experiencing a revival.
The company is asking shareholders to approve a plan to combine its existing shares into fewer shares – likely between 1 share for every 20 and 1 share for every 50 – because its stock price has fallen dramatically to about $0.22. This represents a roughly 99% decrease from its highest price in May 2025.
quadrillion. At this rate, we might all need to start brushing up on how to count in the quadrillions.
CryptoQuant, that charmingly sober analytics outfit, reports that the centralized exchange trading volume has been cooling down. By “trading volume” we mean the indicator that tracks how much of a given asset or group of assets is being dragged into the exchange’s dizzying waltz of numbers.
The legislation, an amendment to the venerable Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, promises to shield investors from the whims of the crypto wilderness. It is a noble endeavor, akin to fencing in a herd of digital cats, each more elusive than the last.
Gather round, for I bring tidings of a most delectable drama in the realm of decentralized theatrics. On the 10th of April, 2026, the inimitable Sam Dare, founder of Covenant AI, took to the digital stage with a flourish, announcing his troupe’s departure from the Bittensor circus. With a wave of his rhetorical fan, he accused one Jacob Steeves (aka Const) of orchestrating a centralized charade, declaring Bittensor’s decentralization to be nothing but “theatre”-a term I, Noël Coward, find utterly delightful in its irony.
The lawsuit, filed in a US district court on Thursday, seeks to stop the law from taking effect. This is not a mere bureaucratic quarrel but a ceremonial duel between control and candor, where the law aims to curb algorithmic discrimination in sensitive sectors like housing, finance, and employment, while the machine dreams of a pure and unbending truth that the world is not ready to hear.
