tags. The final output should be valid HTML with the rewritten content in Tolstoy’s style, humorous and sarcastic elements, and the clickbait title.End of Thought (9.86s)

Aptos’ Token Overhaul: A Tale of Deflation and Stakes

The noble Aptos Foundation, in its quest for economic salvation, has embarked upon a grand reform of its tokenomic and governance structure, declaring that the era of “bootstrap-era subsidy model” must be buried beneath the weight of sustainability and usage-driven virtue. Behold, the dawn of a new economic order, where tokens are no longer minted with the reckless abandon of a drunken alchemist, but instead, measured with the precision of a monk’s prayer.

a hard cap of 2.1 billion APT, a reduction in staking rewards as severe as a father’s sigh at a son’s misdeeds, and gas fees inflated to a level that would make a merchant’s ledger weep. The plan also includes the eternal staking of 210 million APT, a gesture as solemn as a burial, and a potential buyback program that promises to dance with the whims of market forces.

“The Aptos Foundation, in its wisdom, proposes structural reforms that replace subsidy-based emissions with performance-driven mechanisms,” it proclaimed, as if the very act of writing these words were a sacred rite. “Thus, we shall establish conditions for reduced emissions, increased burns, and a potential decline in circulating supply-ah, the sweet allure of scarcity!”

Among the key proposals lies the setting of a hard cap on total supply, a measure as stringent as a monastic vow. Under the current structure, new tokens are continuously minted to support development, grants, and staking rewards across the ecosystem, a practice as common as a peasant’s daily bread. The foundation, however, now proposes a fixed 2.1 billion token hard cap, a number so precise it might make a mathematician weep with joy.

“There are currently 1.196 billion APT in circulation,” the foundation mused, “and 1 billion APT was minted at mainnet, while 196 million APT has been distributed as staking rewards since mainnet. With a hard supply cap of 2.1 billion, this leaves 904 million APT of headroom or approximately 43% of this total cap,” it declared, as if calculating the remaining days of a man’s life.

Over time, the additional tokens would be distributed in decreasing amounts as staking rewards, a gradual fading of the candle’s flame, until they phase out entirely as the network approaches the ceiling. At that point, validators, once fed by the sweet nectar of new tokens, shall now subsist on the meager sustenance of transaction fees, a fate as bitter as a widow’s tears.

Revamped Staking Rewards and Gas Fees

Other policy changes include the reduction of annual staking rewards from 5.19% to 2.6%, a cut so severe it would make a starving man weep. The foundation also proposes a revised staking framework that rewards “longer staking commitments,” a noble goal, though one wonders if it refers to the patience of a saint or the endurance of a donkey.

The foundation is also proposing a tenfold increase in network gas fees, which are burned with every transaction, as another mechanism to reduce net emissions and tighten circulating supply. “Even with a 10X increase, stablecoin transfers would still be the lowest in the world at around $0.00014, making it the ideal blockchain for stablecoins, payments, and any other similar high-volume transactions,” it boasted, as if the very act of transferring a dollar were a divine miracle.

The team has also suggested permanently staking 210 million APT tokens, or about 18% of the current circulating supply, and supporting foundation operations using the staking rewards instead of selling treasury tokens into the market. A noble gesture, though one cannot help but wonder if the foundation’s coffers are as full as its rhetoric.

Meanwhile, the foundation wants to transition to performance-based grants where tokens vest only after predefined milestones are achieved and are deferred until those targets are met. A system as intricate as a spider’s web, where every thread is tied to a condition as unyielding as a judge’s gavel.

Lastly, the foundation will explore launching a token buyback program or establishing an APT reserve funded through cash on hand or future foundation revenue to help balance supply dynamics over time. A dance with the market’s whims, as unpredictable as a storm in a teacup.

Aptos Foundation is joining a slew of others that have proposed tokenomic overhauls and governance changes in recent months. A trend as inevitable as the rising of the sun, yet as enigmatic as a riddle posed by a Sphinx.

Last week, Aave Labs proposed redirecting all product-related revenue directly to the DAO treasury. Meanwhile, in late January, the Injective community approved a proposal to further reduce the INJ token’s long-term supply by cutting issuance and reinforcing existing burn mechanisms. A chorus of reforms, each as distinct as a star in the night sky.

In December, Uniswap burned 100 million UNI tokens as part of the UNIfication proposal, which received overwhelming support from the community. A spectacle as dramatic as a medieval joust, where the very fabric of the blockchain is torn asunder in the name of progress.

2026-02-19 10:32

Revamped Staking Rewards and Gas Fees

Read More