Judge Rejects Ripple and SEC’s Settlement – What Happens Now? Find Out! ⚖️

by

In a twist that no one saw coming — and by no one, I mean the entirety of the crypto community — Judge Analisa Torres has rejected the joint request from Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to finalize their revised settlement agreement. A request both parties thought would smooth over the stormy waters of legal wrangling. What a surprise, right? XRP holders are left hanging once more, staring blankly at the abyss of uncertainty, as the lawsuit lingers on like a bad soap opera that never quite ends.

Let us rewind a bit — earlier this month, Ripple and the SEC had agreed to a revised settlement. They were on the brink of closing the chapter, with Ripple’s financial penalty slashed from $125 million to a mere $50 million. A win, right? Plus, they were hoping to get a refund of that $75 million they had already paid. What could possibly go wrong? Well, everything. They had also aimed to lift the injunction restricting Ripple from certain future actions, a golden ticket to more freedom. But Judge Torres had different plans, refusing the request on the grounds of “procedural missteps.” Ah, the old ‘you forgot to dot the i’s and cross the t’s’ excuse. How very anticlimactic.

Where Is the New Filing?

Now, here’s the kicker — over a week has passed since Judge Torres’ ruling on May 15th, and yet, not a single “corrected filing” has materialized. The XRP community, always on edge like a caffeine-addicted squirrel, has been left wondering: What’s causing this delay? Is it the legal version of “I’ll be there in 5 minutes,” or is something far more sinister afoot?

Because it wasn’t just “procedural inaccuracies.” There was a significant substantive problem with their approach, and the judge made it clear the bar they must clear is a lot higher than they’d claimed.

— Marc Fagel (@Marc_Fagel) May 22, 2025

Enter Marc Fagel, a former SEC lawyer, who offers a bit of clarity. Apparently, it wasn’t just a case of missing a comma or two. No, according to Marc, the real issue was a “significant substantive problem” with the original settlement. And Judge Torres? She wasn’t having any of it. She made it clear that the bar they need to clear is much higher than they’d ever imagined. Looks like they’ll have to roll up their sleeves and try again. 🧐

What Does This Mean for Ripple and XRP?

While this little procedural stumble doesn’t mean the end for Ripple’s chances of settling, it does mean we’re in for a longer wait. Here’s where things stand, for now:

  • The original $125 million fine still stands. Sorry, Ripple. 😬
  • The injunction is still very much alive. No freedom just yet. 🛑
  • The SEC’s case against Ripple is still open, much like that unfinished business with your inbox. 📨

The Ripple vs SEC saga continues to play out like an epic game of chess. Both sides seem eager to settle, but as we all know, courts don’t just change their minds over a couple of friendly suggestions. They need a well-supported legal argument. And in the meantime, XRP holders will have to keep their hopes high — and their stress levels even higher.

Read More

2025-05-23 07:09