It has come to my attention, dear readers, that Mr. Michael Saylor, erstwhile chief executive officer at the, shall we say, intriguing business intelligence firm MicroStrategy, has seen fit to hint at yet another Bitcoin acquisition this Monday. One might wonder if he has any other interests. 🤔
The gentleman, a billionaire of some repute (though perhaps more Bitcoin than repute), took to that modern marvel, the X social media network, to declare, with characteristic brevity, that there are “no tariffs on orange dots.” One can only assume he believes himself to be terribly clever. 😂
No Tariffs on Orange Dots
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) April 13, 2025
The orange dots, you see, are meant to represent MicroStrategy’s incessant Bitcoin purchases. A subtle metaphor, indeed! 🙄
As has been previously chronicled by U.Today, MicroStrategy announced a most substantial $2 billion BTC acquisition on the last day of March, bringing their total hoard to nearly 530,000 coins. One shudders to think of the accounting. 😅
However, lest we be too impressed, it appears the company did *not* buy more coins between the aforementioned date and the sixth of April. A moment of restraint, perhaps, or merely a temporary shortage of funds? 🧐
It is, perhaps, worth noting that MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin obsession typically has little to no discernible impact on the actual price of Bitcoin. One might call it a costly hobby. 🤷♀️
The aforementioned cryptocurrency is currently trading at a mere $84,762 on the Bitcoin stock exchange. Such volatility! 😨
And finally, MicroStrategy’s stock is down a trifling 0.69% in after-hours trading. One trusts Mr. Saylor is not too distressed. 😉
Read More
- Scandal and Speculation! Trump’s Blue Chip Folly Sends Cronos Tumbling and Tumultuous
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Brent Oil Forecast
- Square Bets on Bitcoin: A Tiny Shop’s Grand Wallet Scheme
- Bitcoin’s Wild Ride: $20B Liquidations, Trump’s Tweet, and the Crypto Panic!
- Silver Rate Forecast
- BNB PREDICTION. BNB cryptocurrency
- Trump, Bitcoin, and a Crypto Underdog: CRO’s 17% Rocket Ride Leaves Wall Street Blinking
- tag, not repeated as a header. They want all images retained and no tags or color styles. First, I’ll start with the title. The original title is “Hyperliquid Price Reversal, Will Bears Drag HYPE Down to $35?” I need to make it more clickbaity and Terry Pratchett-esque. Maybe something like “Hyperliquid’s Great HYPE-Drama: Bulls vs. Bears in a Deathwobble of Doom 🐂🐻💸” That’s under 100 characters? Let me check: “Hyperliquid’s Great HYPE-Drama: Bulls vs. Bears in a Deathwobble of Doom 🐂🐻💸” – yes, 97 characters. Good. Next, the body. The first paragraph talks about the rollercoaster week with whale activity and liquidations. Terry would probably compare it to something absurd. Maybe a “rollercoaster” isn’t enough. Maybe “the Hyperliquid rollercoaster took a detour through a black hole” or something. Also, mention the whale trader with a humorous twist. Maybe “a certain whale with a penchant for drama and a balance sheet thicker than a fantasy novel” to add that Pratchett flair. The second paragraph about the $19 billion event. Maybe refer to it as “the Great Liquidation of Doom” or something. “fresh on the backdrop” could be “fresh from the annals of ‘Oh My Goodness, Not Again'” to add humor. In the price analysis section, the 8% drop. Terry might compare it to a “graceful swan dive into a puddle of despair.” The market cap and volume up 4.22%-maybe “panic selling and algorithmic trades are having a party where the only music is the sound of wallets sobbing.” The technicals part: slipped below SMA lines. Maybe “HYPE decided to play ‘hot potato’ with its moving averages.” MACD and RSI-describe them as “momentum indicators are throwing a hissy fit” and RSI “hovering near 41 like a nervous pigeon.” The FAQs need to be rewritten with sarcasm. “Why is Hyperliquid underperforming?” could be phrased as “Why is Hyperliquid underperforming? Well, let’s see. It’s like asking why a duck is bad at chess…” Then mention the technical breakdowns and whale shorts as “a perfect storm of technical breakdowns and whale-sized shorts.” Next support level: “The $33-$35 range is the next critical support zone…” Maybe “the $33-$35 range is where hopes go to be gently soothed by Fibonacci fairy dust.” Recovery question: “HYPE needs a sustained close above $41.42…” Maybe “HYPE needs to do the equivalent of a sober caber toss over $41.42.” Throughout, add emojis where appropriate. For example, after mentioning whales, add 🐋💸. In the FAQs, maybe 💩 for the underperforming question. Check for all images retained. The figure tag is there, so leave it as is. Avoid using tags, no color styles. Ensure the title is only in the tag and not as a header. The original had H2 headers, so keep those but maybe tweak the text to be more whimsical. Like “Hyperliquid Price Analysis” becomes “Hyperliquid Price Analysis (Or: The Day the HYPE Died?)” Wait, but the user said not to repeat the title in the body as a header. The original title was “Hyperliquid Price Reversal, Will Bears Drag HYPE Down to $35?” but the new title is different. So the H2 headers should be original, so the first H2 can stay as “Hyperliquid Price Analysis” but maybe add some humor there. Alternatively, maybe “Hyperliquid’s Great Adventure in the Land of Red Arrows” or something. But need to make sure it’s not the same as the title. Also, ensure that the humor is consistent throughout, with a bit of sarcasm and playful language. Avoid markdown, just HTML. Check for any tags and remove them. Use , , , etc., as in the original. Finally, wrap it all in HTML structure with the new title, and ensure emojis are appropriately placed without overdoing it. Let me go through each section step by step and inject the humor, sarcasm, and emojis as per Terry Pratchett’s style.End of Thought (23.26s) Hyperliquid’s Great HYPE-Drama: Bulls vs. Bears in a Deathwobble of Doom 🐂🐻💸
- Bitcoin’s Tragicomic Plunge: $75K or Bust? 🎭💸
2025-04-13 21:16