Amid a mass exodus of public miners towards the humming, silicon‑powered future, Charles Edwards of Capriole predicts that the share of “crypto revenue” in the sector will plummet from a dazzling 90 % to a more modest 30 % by 2026. Two diametrically opposed experts have surfaced, arguing over whether this transition heralds a security collapse or simply a clever arbitrage.
Edwards, ever the cynic, warns of a bitcoinine ring‑down as hash‑power flees to AI. Sir Adam Back, conversely, dismisses the spectre of a digital siege, insisting that the shift is no more disruptive than a quaint market play.
Is the AI boom truly a threat to Bitcoin?
Edwards’ reasoning: the market is “voting with its feet,” for the capitalisation of AI‑ambition firms has, on average, surged by 500 %, whereas traditional miners see their returns go negative. He fears the very instant quantum computing demands maximum protection, the fundamental security of BTC is already crumbling.
Shiba Inu (SHIB) Most Stable It Has Ever Been, Hyperliquid (HYPE) on Verge of New ATH, XRP Price Spikes Through First Resistance: Crypto Market Review
No, this is actually good for miners: if Hashrate falls profit margin increases. It’s an arbitrage, with equilibrium when mining margin is the same as AI workloads. Higher profit margin adds to positive reflexivity-miners sell less Bitcoin to cover power, and as price rises.
– Adam Back (@adam3us) April 17, 2026
Back counters that the exodus of some players into AI is merely a rational optimisation. With diminished competition for hash‑rate, the remaining miners enjoy higher margins, enabling them to withhold more BTC from the market, creating a supply deficit that pushes the price upward.
Edwards cites that many industry giants have halted ASIC fleet upgrades, funneling all investments into AI infrastructure-an unmistakable sign of waning interest in the network. Back, however, sees the profits from AI contracts as a subsidy that turns financially stable firms into net buyers rather than forced sellers.
Edwards fears that the miner exodus leaves the network vulnerable to external threats. Back contends that the 90 % hash‑rate controlled by monetarily robust enterprises is strategically superior to the 100 % controlled by players on the brink of bankruptcy.
For Edwards, the migration to AI signals a weakening of Bitcoin’s computational shield. For Back, it is not a betrayal but an elegant evolution into highly profitable hybrid structures.
Read More
- ETH PREDICTION. ETH cryptocurrency
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Silver Rate Forecast
- Warning: Binance-Listed Siren Token Rallies 30X—Here’s Why You Should Stay Away
- Crypto Listings Fail: Market Dives in Disgrace 🚀💸
- Brent Oil Forecast
- Toss Tosses Its Hat into the Web3 Ring: A Fintech Farce in the Making!
- TRX EUR PREDICTION. TRX cryptocurrency
- Bitcoin’s Dwindling Dowry: Will BTC Crumble Under the Mega‑Shadow of Macroeconomic Melancholy?
- Bitcoin’s Tiny Investors Are Gobbling Up the Market Like Chocolate Factories!
2026-04-17 17:59